- mat-wg - mailman.ripe.net

RIPE Atlas Value Proposition Published
by Kaveh Ranjbar 24 Oct '14

24 Oct '14

Dear colleagues, During its meeting in September, the RIPE NCC presented the RIPE NCC Executive Board with a value proposition document detailing the value that RIPE Atlas can bring to network operators, researchers and the Internet community as a whole. The board asked the RIPE NCC to publish this document, which is available on RIPE Labs: https://labs.ripe.net/Members/suzanne_taylor_muzzin/ripe-atlas-value-propos… We also plan to incorporate much of the document's content into the RIPE Atlas website so that RIPE Atlas users can clearly understand the different ways this global Internet measurement network can be used and the many unique benefits it provides. We hope you will find this document useful and that you may even be inspired to make use of RIPE Atlas in new ways. Kind regards, Kaveh Ranjbar Chief Information Officer RIPE NCC

1 0

Draft agenda for MAT @ RIPE69
by Christian Kaufmann 20 Oct '14

20 Oct '14

Hello All, This is the draft agenda for the Measurement, Analysis and Tools Working Group session at RIPE69: A. Introduction: Welcome, Scribe, Jabber, Agenda (5m) B. On the suitability of two large-scale Internet measurement platforms (20m) Randy Bush D. The value of WLAN measurements for the R&E Community (20m) Brook Schofield E. OpenIPMap (crowdsourcing Internet infrastructure geolocation) (10m) Emile Aben F. "RIPE Atlas #dataviz” (10m) Vesna Manojlovic G. Python and RIPE ATLAS (20m) APIVaibhav Bajpai Z. AOB Timings are approximate. The session will take place at 14:00 local time on Wednesday 5th November. We are looking forward to see you all in London, Richard & Christian

2 1

Community Feedback on Draft RIPE Atlas Service Terms and Conditions
by Vesna Manojlovic 07 Oct '14

07 Oct '14

Dear colleagues, On September 15 we announced the new draft of the Terms and Conditions for the RIPE Atlas service: https://labs.ripe.net/Members/becha/ripe-atlas-moving-to-production-service We received feedback from the community and we’d like to thank you for your input. Below is a summary of the main points raised and our response. ------------------------------- Security audits and user assistance ------------------------------- We were asked to clarify what is meant by “security audits and checks” and what “assistance” users would be obliged to provide. We will clarify this in the next draft. -------------------------------------- Contradiction between Articles 2.3 and 10.1 -------------------------------------- We were asked to clarify the perceived contradiction between Articles 2.3 and 10.1 about informing users about the future changes to the Terms and Conditions (T&C). There was a strong preference stated to actively alert users about upcoming changes. It was suggested to allow for a window of time after notification before changes are applied (e.g. 30 days). We will inform users about the upcoming T&C changes by email, as outlined in the “implementation timeline” (point #3) in the RIPE Labs article. In reference to the articles, Article 2.3 is about amendments to the T&Cs and Article 10.1 is about other RIPE Documents that are created using different procedures and include points of references for the T&Cs. ---------------------- Minor editorial changes ---------------------- We were given several minor editorial suggestions. We will review the suggested edits. --------------------------- Strong legalese in the T&C -------------------------- Some people raised concern about the “strong legalese” included in the updated T&Cs. The inclusion of those provisions is to align the T&Cs with the other legal documents of the RIPE NCC. We felt that the document should reflect the RIPE NCC’s operational practices and should clarify the mutual responsibilities and expectations of probe hosts and the RIPE NCC. The Terms and Conditions is a legal document and the rights and obligations between both parties should be clearly and fully stated. Unfortunately legalese cannot be avoided. We would like to thank you again for your input. If you have any other comments about the text or the implementation procedure, please let us know. Please let us know if you have any other comments on the text or the implementation procedure. Kind regards, Vesna Manojlovic Community Builder for Measurements Tools

1 0

Re: [mat-wg] [routing-wg] Fwd: [ARIN-consult] Consultation on New Experimental Allocation
by Emile Aben 06 Oct '14

06 Oct '14

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 05/08/14 12:51, Job Snijders wrote: > On Tue, Aug 05, 2014 at 12:38:17PM +0200, Emile Aben wrote: >> I'd like to inform you of an experiment we propose doing together with >> ARIN about the routability of prefixes longer than /24 out of ARINs >> 23.128.0.0/10 block. For more details see ARIN's announcement below. >> >> If people have any feedback on this, please let us know. > > I recommend testing with and without proper route: objects for the small > prefixes. > > As a service provider I would accept smaller than /24... If and only if > there is an exact route object for the prefix, other providers just > discard anything smaller than a /24, regardless of the existance of > proper route objects. Would be good to quantify this. We plan to start announcing a couple of prefixes from AS12654 within the next hour for the purpose of reachability checking of prefixes longer than /24 out of ARINs 23.128.0.0/10 block: With route object: prefix pingable IP 23.128.24.0/24 23.128.24.1 23.128.25.0/25 23.128.25.1 23.128.25.240/28 23.128.25.241 Without route object: prefix pingable IP 23.128.124.0/24 23.128.124.1 23.128.125.0/25 23.128.125.1 23.128.125.240/28 23.128.125.241 best regards, Emile Aben RIPE NCC -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJULRhIAAoJEKxthF6wloMOuR4QAJys9r18hwmu8DsF2nr6mCje wjYoKcJP/AAl0vQpQLMhR70D9b9v5XQArcMyvzoXRqcFYTfz5yAy9rsOD1pWOE8r dz/XmTzp45fmTRBMbCgQNVA4FLhv0Iq9Qx2eVSWhgLGSTNRNM9oGUTOVvzaIZ551 hx0+dbexz6AO9LlHeeam+rulHsIrsXXeMHhuLz1yU/MkW+MEyadJPQqLpMjIvCBs 4ENPDe358J4SQVMi7Ur55mXaF8vCJ4lP9CXCzcSvEa+S+iuoN9+xrDC6+QPHPj8k 1ZWiSN903ESQBcTG+uX69GH0qHCD/ADYswL705GEayRhXh0VlCdUwkfBCZdYKRn/ KB5hvJ+xkXIA+2mlBJYuJDWs3WB9xZ4ijID6hEbyqfiX1TqNQy0qPPS5HWrkeZg6 UCVBDFvZnn39z7BOSNLvf3bSc1VWK2AikS+6pzyyd8i4Pdk7GVPxFnsHdfEwkRJz n7h0Vjn7MOrnS6Fy29dJ1E+HC3PlN+W1hE9j4vO3sGrKHEc9tIW9MZ8Wg35qKi5c oUp9wylYhkjl3YKHxtc4bUXwzQqdYa7sxXPKIX5yfYLa+0mIdnQgWqK2Rzd+/rAa JfNPCrgJkxUrd8Gut6OkaV5EhgojYfvrGe3qfZj9OvhG4SQcDjbTW24rdySjtMJS mADNKNND94MRp43ehre3 =bh0Q -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

1 1

Call for Presentations at RIPE 69 in London
by Christian Kaufmann 06 Oct '14

06 Oct '14

Dear MAT WG, We co-chairs are beginning to put together the agenda for the MAT working group meeting on wednesday 5th November at RIPE 69 in London and there are still 3 slots left. If you have something you would like to present, please let us know no later than Friday, 17th October 2014. Thanks a lot, Richard Barnes and Christian Kaufmann MAT Co-Chairs

2 1

Re: [mat-wg] [dns-wg] Final Call For Presentations RIPE 69, deadline 1 October 2014
by Daniel Karrenberg 25 Sep '14

25 Sep '14

The correct link for the draft program is: https://ripe69.ripe.net/programme/meeting-plan/draft-programme/

1 0

Call For Presentations RIPE 69, deadline 31 August 2014
by Benno Overeinder 24 Sep '14

24 Sep '14

Dear colleagues, Please find the CFP for RIPE 69 in London below. The deadline for submissions is 31 August 2014. Please also note that speakers do not receive any extra reduction or funding towards the meeting fee at the RIPE Meetings. Kind regards, RIPE PC http://www.ripe.net/ripe/meetings/ripe-meetings/pc --------------------- Call for Presentations A RIPE Meeting is an open event where Internet Service Providers, network operators and other interested parties get together. Although the meeting is mostly technical, it is also a chance for people to meet and network with others in their field. RIPE 69 will take place from 3-7 November 2014 in London, UK. The RIPE Programme Committee (PC) is now seeking content proposals from the RIPE community for the plenary session presentations, BoFs (Birds of a Feather sessions), panels, workshops, tutorials and lightning talks at RIPE 69. The PC is looking for presentations covering topics of network engineering and operations, including but not limited to: - IPv6 deployment - Managing IPv4 scarcity in operations - Commercial transactions of IPv4 addresses - Data centre technologies - Network and DNS operations - Internet governance and regulatory practices - Network and routing security - Content delivery - Internet peering and mobile data exchange Submissions RIPE Meeting attendees are quite sensitive to keeping presentations non-commercial, and product marketing talks are strongly discouraged. Repeated audience feedback shows that the most successful talks focus on operational experience, research results, or case studies. For example, presenters wishing to describe a commercial solution should focus on the underlying technology and not attempt a product demonstration. The RIPE PC accepts proposals for different presentation formats, including plenary session presentations, tutorials, workshops, BoFs (Birds of a Feather sessions) and lightning talks. See the full descriptions of these formats at https://ripe69.ripe.net/submit-topic/presentation-formats/ Presenters who are proposing a panel or BoF are encouraged to include speakers from several (perhaps even competing) companies and/or a neutral facilitator. In addition to presentations selected in advance for the plenary, the RIPE PC also offers several time slots for "lightning talks", which are selected immediately before or during the conference. The following general requirements apply: - Proposals for plenary session presentations, BoFs, panels, workshops and tutorials must be submitted for full consideration no later than 31 August 2014, using the meeting submission system at https://ripe69.ripe.net/submit-topic/guidelines/. Proposals submitted after this date will be considered on a space-available basis. - Lightning talks should also be submitted using the meeting submission system (https://ripe69.ripe.net/submit-topic/submission-form/) and can be submitted just days before the RIPE Meeting starts or even during the meeting week. The allocation of lightning talk slots will be announced in short notice – in some cases on the same day but often one day prior to the relevant session. - Presenters should indicate how much time they will require. See more information on time slot allocations per presentation format at https://ripe69.ripe.net/submit-topic/presentation-formats/. - Proposals for talks will only be considered by the PC if they contain at least draft presentation slides (slides may be updated later on). For panels, proposals must contain a clear description, as well as the names of invited panellists, presenters and moderators. - Due to potential technical issues, it is expected that most, if not all, presenters/panellists will be physically present at the RIPE Meeting. If you have any questions or requests concerning content submissions, please email pc [at] ripe [dot] net. --------------------- -- Benno J. Overeinder NLnet Labs http://www.nlnetlabs.nl/

1 1

Feedback on draft RIPE Atlas Service Terms and Conditions
by Adam Piggott 16 Sep '14

16 Sep '14

Hello, Having read the draft I find the T&Cs quite sensible but have some points to bring up. 7.1. [...] The RIPE NCC may perform security checks and audits to determine unauthorised use of the RIPE Atlas Service. 7.2. Users must assist the RIPE NCC with security checks and audits. These are a very open-ended statements and I'm sure that RIPE NCC has no intention of visiting our homes or places of work to perform "security checks and audits". The terms are written in a "legalese" form of language and hence must be taken at face value by those who accept them. I would not be comfortable agreeing to these two points without some sort of clarification as to what "security audits and checks" could be, and what "assistance" I would be obliged to provide. 10.1. All the RIPE Documents referred to in this agreement are available on http://www.ripe.net/. The Probe Host will regularly take notice of updated RIPE Documents on the website. I cannot accept this term. I can only accept to be bound to new terms if they are sent to me directly, for example by email. Article 2.3 seems to infer that RIPE NCC will indeed contact users directly at least 30 days in advance, which is acceptable. Thanks to RIPE NCC for including the community in such an important process. -- Adam Piggott, Proprietor Proactive Services (Computing)

2 1

Seeking community feedback on draft RIPE Atlas Service Terms and Conditions
by Vesna Manojlovic 15 Sep '14

15 Sep '14

Dear colleagues, As RIPE Atlas transitions from a pilot project to a production service, we want to publish RIPE Atlas Service Terms and Conditions that describe the use of the service and spell out both the user's and the RIPE NCC's obligations. We have published these proposed terms and conditions, along with an implementation plan, on RIPE Labs. Please take a look and let us know what you think. Your feedback is valuable, and and want to ensure we keep the community involved in every step of the process. https://labs.ripe.net/Members/becha/ripe-atlas-moving-to-production-service The main discussion about this should happen on the MAT Working Group Mailing List. We are asking to receive all feedback by the end of the RIPE 69 meeting in London, which takes places 3-7 November. Once the MAT Working Group Chairs have determined that consensus has been reached, a final version of the terms and conditions will be published. We're aiming to do so before the end of the year, so that RIPE Atlas can become a full production service by January 2015. Kind regards, Vesna Manojlovic Senior Community Builder Measurements Community Building RIPE NCC

1 0

New on RIPE Labs: RIPE Atlas Measurements with Tagged Probes coming soon
by Mirjam Kuehne 12 Sep '14

12 Sep '14

Dear colleagues, Please find a new article on RIPE Labs: RIPE Atlas: Measurements with Tagged Probes Coming Soon https://labs.ripe.net/Members/suzanne_taylor_muzzin/ripe-atlas-measurements… If you have any comments or questions, please let us know. Kind regards, Mirjam Kuehne RIPE NCC

1 0