Re: IP assignment for virtual webhosting
Dear Poul-Henning, =>Something along the lines of why static IP for the applicants web hosting =>product/services is absolutely necessary. => =>> start judging what =>> are "good" and "bad" applications ? => =>RIPE do that anyway! = =But we can add that quite a number of LIR's seem unaware of this =practice: = =You can find the entire list of offenders at: = = http://stat.cybercity.dk/ripe = =And a "Bad guys" list at: = = http://stat.cybercity.dk/ripe/bad.html = =#IPs LIR =----------------------- =11944 se.swipnet = = [ ... ] you seem to imply that the number of host addresses you see (from within address blocks that happen to have "inconsistencies" in the DB objects) is directly related to the number of addresses assigned for virtual applications? I'm lost... Wilfried.
In message <009E1538.EB892A88.3@cc.univie.ac.at>, "Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOn et" writes:
Dear Poul-Henning,
=>Something along the lines of why static IP for the applicants web hosting =>product/services is absolutely necessary. => =>> start judging what =>> are "good" and "bad" applications ? => =>RIPE do that anyway! = =But we can add that quite a number of LIR's seem unaware of this =practice: =[...]
you seem to imply that the number of host addresses you see
(from within address blocks that happen to have "inconsistencies" in the DB objects)
is directly related to the number of addresses assigned for virtual applications? I'm lost...
No I merely pointed out that some LIR doesn't seem to bother much with RIPEs rules in the first place, and consequently any new rules may not stand much chance either unless breaking RIPE rules have some negative consequences... -- Poul-Henning Kamp FreeBSD coreteam member phk@FreeBSD.ORG "Real hackers run -current on their laptop." FreeBSD -- It will take a long time before progress goes too far!
Poul-Henning Kamp (phk@critter.freebsd.dk) typed
No I merely pointed out that some LIR doesn't seem to bother much with RIPEs rules in the first place, and consequently any new rules may not stand much chance either unless breaking RIPE rules have some negative consequences...
You also don't take notice of the fact that RIPE have stated that they do not want us to update the RIPE database with our Dial-Up IPs, the majority of what you continually show in your little table... #IPs LIR ----------------------- 11944 se.swipnet 1495 uk.pol 1240 uk.demon If you want to yet again discuss this further, please e-mail hostmaster@demon.net, as this is off-topic. Better yet, please ask RIPE for confirmation... Sam Bradford ----------------------------------------------------------------- sam bradford, hostmaster sam.bradford@demon.net Demon Internet / Thus plc e-mail: hostmaster@demon.net 322 Regents Park Road, Finchley, London N3 2QQ, UK (0181-371-1000) Herengracht 433, 1017 BR, Amsterdam, Netherlands (020-4222-000)
participants (3)
-
Poul-Henning Kamp -
Sam Bradford -
Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet