Stephen,
Ok the proposal.
2 brief questions, the 2nd one might be pretty stupid, actually: 1) do I correctly read (between the lines) that you would be prepared to renumber into a properly sized new block? 2) would your IGP-problem, at least in theory, be solvable by braking the AS into a number of smaller ASs, say roughly along the lines of your address blocks per registry? Thanks, Wilfried
----- Original Message ----- From: "Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet" <woeber@cc.univie.ac.at> To: <stephenb@uk.uu.net> Cc: <lir-wg@ripe.net>; <woeber@cc.univie.ac.at> Sent: Saturday, September 08, 2001 11:04 PM Subject: RE: MIR proposal
Stephen,
Ok the proposal.
2 brief questions, the 2nd one might be pretty stupid, actually:
1) do I correctly read (between the lines) that you would be prepared to renumber into a properly sized new block?
This is a major undertaking but looking at AS701 it may be the only solution in the long run, the new registries would not be too bad but the older ones would be a nightmare.
2) would your IGP-problem, at least in theory, be solvable by braking the AS into a number of smaller ASs, say roughly along the lines of your address blocks per registry?
No we have moved from multiple AS to a single AS to solve some of this problem and others too.
Thanks, Wilfried
participants (2)
-
Stephen Burley -
Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet