In message <37E11CDE.62530B5B@telia.net>, Amar writes:
Poul-Henning Kamp skrev:
In message <37E113A2.D37D190C@telia.net>, Amar writes:
I actually disagree. It is rather obvious from the various consistency reports that some LIR's are more in need of a visit than others...
The numbers suggested have the pontential to create a sitiuation where the hostmasters would be able to visit those LIR:s that have a problem with consistency.
But you bring up a point here.
Well, my point was not quite one of those you present, it was more along the lines: Wouldn't it be a more profitable use of RIPEs funds to visit the provably needy LIRs ? even at a 50/50 funding split, this is going to drain a lot of resources from RIPE, so we might as well try to get some tangible benefits from it. Of course we could also try to add a new policy which says that if a LIR after three warnings from RIPE havn't gotten their act together they get a RIPE visit, and the full bill for that visit (the "RIPE-MIB": RIPE-Men In Black :-) -- Poul-Henning Kamp FreeBSD coreteam member phk@FreeBSD.ORG "Real hackers run -current on their laptop." FreeBSD -- It will take a long time before progress goes too far!