12 Jun
2002
12 Jun
'02
1:55 p.m.
On Wed, 2002-06-12 at 13:17, Robert Kiessling wrote:
Nigel Titley <nigel@titley.com> writes:
This is still missing a status for allocations done by LIRs to someone
Don't you mean assignments? :-)
No.
who is neither LIR nor end user ("NLA").
Examples? (I'm probably just being stupid)
5.3 of the 2002-04-25 draft: "LIR-to-ISP allocation". LIRs are free to suballocate the allocation they got from a RIR. Such a suballocation is neither an assignment nor a RIR-allocation, so should get a separate status attribute (as found in the original proposal).
Apologies. I forgot the thread originated in an IPv6 context, and since then it has ended up copied to the world and his wife. To which end I've trimmed the Cc: Nigel