Not really important, but just to avoid being counted as agreeing :-)
Anyway, I think that everyone have suggested to do both with a OR in between.
...no objection against the OR, but the result of the OR should not be the _only_ input to a decision process. It would be an efficient mechanism to be used _in support_ of continued AS# holdership, though.
Basically just claiming that "yes I do peer at backwater-IX with Farm-IP and Countryside Networks and I don't get transit from anywhere" should not be enouhg.
I disagree.
RIPE should be able to verify that this is true.
Some nit-picking... RIPE (the community): I don't think so - other than having access to some publicly accessible documentation, e.g. in the Routing Registry. The NCC: maybe, if and when we can agree on the criteria, and the cost for verification vs. the result.
- kurtis -
Wilfried.