Re: [lir-wg] AS Number Policy

Lets see the following example:

+-----------+ +-------+ | AS-UPLINK | | AS-IX | +---------o-+ +o------+ | | +o-----------o+ | AS-CUSTOMER | +-------------+

[ ... ]

Should AS-CUSTOMER be considered as multihomed?

Definitely, as they'd probably have more then one eBPG session, and probably a different routing policy. I don't see any reason to treat "customer" status (i.e. packets shipped for money) different from "peering" status (i.e. packets shipped for "free").

-- Regards, Vladimir.

Wilfried.