8 Oct
2002
8 Oct
'02
9:07 p.m.
On Tue, Oct 08, 2002 at 11:19:03AM +0200, Daniel Karrenberg wrote:
randy wrote:
o things such as golden v6 allocations for anything 'important' were discussed in a wg, voted (with almost no representation by folk who run routers, i.e. will pay the costs), and done with long laundry lists of ideas for who might deserve golden prefixes, and all were approved. it was a childish land grab.
Sorry I am not aware of the issue. What worries me is that I cannot find a reference to what you talk about in the minutes of either the IPv6 DB or this WG. This is bad. Can you point me there?
Just for the record: no such things happened in the ipv6 wg at the last RIPE meeting. It's the lir wg who sets policy. David K. ---