On Thu, 11 May 2000, Mark Lastdrager wrote: Dear Sirs, It's really sad, but your apache-around discussion is not interesting for 90% mailing list readers... Are you sure that I (and all my collegue) want read THIS? We're ready to keep our eyes open for ANY RIPE team messages, even 1st April jokes, but NOT your life-around discussion about bananas prices in Honduras. To RIPE team: Sirs, please, open about-life@ripe.net mailing list discussion for this kind of writer :)
Date: Thu, 11 May 2000 13:44:34 +0200 (MET DST) From: Mark Lastdrager <mark@pine.nl> To: Dave Wilson <dave.wilson@heanet.ie> Cc: lir-wg@ripe.net Subject: Re: IP assignment for virtual webhosting
At Thu, 11 May 2000, owner-lir-wg@ripe.net wrote:
Can you expand on this? Is the difference between counted and real traffic random, or a roughly equal (or proportional) overhead for each server? Is the difference so significant that one cannot take it into account as part of the charging structure?
I did some research on this topic a while ago. The traffic Apache measures (based on filesize) can be 10 to 50% smaller than the traffic the router measures. Ofcourse this depends on the filesize, packetsize etc.
Mark Lastdrager Pine Internet
-- email: mark@lastdrager.nl :: ML1400-RIPE :: tel. +31-70-3111010 http://www.pine.nl :: RIPE RegID nl.pine :: fax. +31-70-3111011 PGP key ID 92BB81D1 :: Dutch security news @ http://security.nl Today's excuse: the router thinks its a printer.
--- Pavel Golubev PG810-RIPE Global Ukraine Ltd.