
11 May
2001
11 May
'01
10:05 a.m.
Hello, Quote from David R Huberman: } Exchange point address space should only be used to establish those } interconnections with the routers - not for any ancillary services the } exchange point might provide that require internet connectivity. Such } services should *not* be part of any exchange point address policy } considered by LIR-WG, imo. I agree with this and with Randy's comment that an exchange point can use someone else's address space for the extra services, but I also see a potential problem with it: They will still want to multihome the networks they use for those services anyway for a plethora of reasons. In my opinion something like a /60 would be a reasonable tradeoff. -- Aleksi Suhonen