On Thu, 16 May 2002, Gert Doering wrote:
On Wed, May 15, 2002 at 07:32:38PM +0200, Hans Petter Holen wrote:
Personaly I feel it is a pity that this has turned into a "please use NAT".
It has NOT. The RIPE185-bis document is clear on this.
Therefore, I am proposing to change this policy into:
- stop asking this question - stop promoting NAT
Any views on this ?
I seriously think that adding a second question "have you considered IPv6" (if only to raise awareness "IPv6 is here to stay") might be a good thing.
Would it not be very very wise to avoid doing that until *anyone* has worked out a coherent and workable IPv6 allocation/assignment policy? -- Patrick Evans Email: pre@pre.org CV: www.pre.org/pre/cv Bike: Kawasaki ZXR400L9 (for sale) "her eyes were like pissholes in the snow - they could melt right through me"