17 Jul
2002
17 Jul
'02
4:12 p.m.
--On Wednesday, July 17, 2002 12:08:48 +1000 Philip Smith <pfs@cisco.com> wrote:
It seems as though the RIPE NCC couldn't care less though about the forgery, and that is alarming given that address and AS allocation is supposed to be their function.
What is ofcourse interesting as well is - what can the NCC do to stop this or prevent it from happening in the future? They can send angry emails and remove the objects from the database (which ofcourse would be a good start...:) ), but they can't prevent the AS:es from being routed. What is really interesting is that some upstream is actually accepting these AS:es as peers... - kurtis -