24 Apr
2002
24 Apr
'02
9:51 p.m.
nope. should nasa return 128.8 just because the server is moved from 128.8.10.90? i don't think so. but, if it is moved, they should not put anything else at 128.8.10.90 for a decade or two. Which makes you agree with Joao, doesn't it? The way it was done with 128.8 obviously created problems, which would mean that "special networks for root name servers" might be a good thing after all...
no, quite the opposite o nasa should just not put another host at that HOST address o and the kremlin should not announce 128.8/16 o and all the other obvious things that we operators are paid to do and not do. randy