26 Jan
1996
26 Jan
'96
9:34 a.m.
On Thu, 25 Jan 1996 16:49:48 -0800 you said:
We've got a basic conflict between "smaller" and "better", whose resolution will require (in the absense of really good renumbering technology) constraining our insistance on efficient address utilization by measuring the effect this has on routing tables. We need to get some quantitative goals assigned to this so we can measure what is "good" and "bad". I'd (again) suggest the following:
A /19 in Amsterdam makes sense as a maximum allocation. A /19 in Uganda doesn't. I think due to different geographics we need to realize that allocation policy has to be different depending on where you are. Hank