Hank Nussbacher <hank@att.net.il> writes: * At 16:15 10/05/00 +0100, you wrote: * * Can you explain why it was sent on May 10 and only hit the list on May 15? * Hello Henk, It was basically caused by a mixture of miscommunication and myself being a little preoccupied with RIPE Meeting preparations. My apologies for this. On May 10 Adrian sent the message, which didn't make it to the list - it was too large and bounced to moderator's mailbox. Instead of instantly approving it to the list, I asked Adrian to put the document on the web or ftp and to send a URL to the list - exactly for this reason: to avoid sending big attachments to the list. Unfortunately the answer from Adrian did not come to the moderator, myself, directly. As soon as we received his answer and realised we could best forward the large attachment the message was sent. Unfortunately this caused a delay which with hind sight may have been avoided. We sent the file with a warning, to inform people that the message contained a large MS format attachment. Becha RIPE NCC * -Hank * * >Ladies & Gentlemen, * > * >At the RIPE35 meeting there was some debate regarding the requirements for * >IP addressing by the GPRS Mobile technology. A small working group was * >formed, and subsequently some progress has been made. The attachment * >provides more information, and will be of interest to those attending the * >LIR-WG at RIPE36. * > <<Working_Party_Briefing_paper_GPRS_addressing.doc>> * > * >> Regards, * >> * >> Adrian F Pauling * >> :-)NEL2C Internet Protocol Manager * >> acd Information Systems Engineering Technical Architecture * >> AFP1-RIPE / AFP-ARIN / AFP25-InterNIC * >> * adrian.pauling@bt.com * >> * +44 19 2685 1992 / +44 78 0290 4877 * > * * *