Robert Martin-Legene <robert@dknet.dk> writes: Daniel Karrenberg wrote:
My proposal would read like:
- VSEs can use private address space (RFC1697)
RFC1597 I suspect.
Just a test whether people read it.
Sounds fair to me. Although I foresee internal routing problems here. I suspect they can be solved with routing entries for each individual host (?). The local routing table would become quite big, but that is not so much of concern (yet? :-)) With time CIDR-aware software will be available.
What you can do internally depends on the technology you use. I would suspect that you can subnet in your POPs so that customers connected to the same POP can share Cs. If you can't do that the story ends and you have to give customers Cs. But that is only for those who connect eventually and not for everyone who asks a last-resort registry. Daniel