Jim, Why don't you and Joe Baptista and Jeff Williams get off our mailing lists, create your own little list and spam each other with junk? (Unless you're the same person - noone has ever seen any of you "mystery men", isn't that right?) The rest of us are actually interested in useful community participation. Thanks RIRs for a good job by the way. Martin Andersen
-- Original Message -- From: "Jim Fleming" <JimFleming@ameritech.net> To: "Peter Galbavy" <peter.galbavy@knowtion.net>, "Andrei Robachevsky" <andrei@ripe.net> Cc: <yjpark@myepark.com>, <steinle@smartvia.de>, "Richard J. Sexton" <richard@vrx.net>, "Richard Henderson" <richardhenderson@ntlworld.com>, <ray@fassett.org>, <love@cptech.org>, <karl@cavebear.com>, <k@widgital.com>, <jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com>, "Joop Teernstra" <terastra@terabytz.co.nz>, "Joey Borda **star*walker**" <starwalker@gay.com>, "Joe Baptista" <baptista@dot-god.com>, "Joanna Lane" <jo-uk@rcn.com>, <JMKing@ipro.org>, "Jkhan" <Jkhan@MetroMgr.com>, <jefsey@jefsey.com>, <hans.klein@pubpolicy.gatech.edu>, <faia@amauta.rcp.net.pe>, <eric@hi-tek.com>, "Elisabeth Porteneuve" <Elisabeth.Porteneuve@cetp.ipsl.fr>, "Bruce Young" <Bruce@barelyadequate.info>, "Ben Edelman" <edelman@law.harvard.edu>, <andy@ccc.de>, "@quasar Internet Solutions, Inc." <shore@quasar.net>, "Stephen Waters" <swaters@amicus.com>, <chandley@ntia.doc.gov>, <censslin@ntia.doc.gov>, <DEvans@doc.gov>, <nvictory@ntia.doc.gov>, <RLayton@ntia.doc.gov>, <vinton.g.cerf@WCOM.COM>, <mouhamet@next.sn>, <lynn@icann.org>, <lyman@acm.org>, <junsec@wide.ad.jp>, <jcohen@shapirocohen.com>, <apisan@servidor.unam.mx>, <Amadeu@nominalia.com>, <helmut.schink@icn.siemens.de>, <lir-wg@ripe.net>, <db-wg@ripe.net>, "Milton Mueller" <Mueller@syr.edu> Subject: Re: [db-wg] Re: [lir-wg] Re: ERX of v4 address space proposal Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 09:18:10 -0600
From: "Andrei Robachevsky" <andrei@ripe.net>
Our current data shows that around 753 networks will go to APNIC, 9072
stay with ARIN, 92 will go to LACNIC and 3176 to RIPE NCC.
That of course only applies to the 32-bit AM(0) address space with TOS=0x00,0x*0,0x0*. The FM(1) address space can be allocated based more on quality, as opposed to quantity or unwillingness to pay market value for DNS services and Internet resources.
Where do all of the other /8s end up ? http://www.iana.org/assignments/ipv4-address-space Have the RIRs taken all of them over from ICANN ?
Note, LACNIC is less than 30 days old, and it will get 92 /8s ? *each* valued at $1 to $2 billion dollars ?
----- Original Message ----- From: "Andrei Robachevsky" <andrei@ripe.net> To: "Peter Galbavy" <peter.galbavy@knowtion.net> Cc: <db-wg@ripe.net>; <lir-wg@ripe.net> Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 8:40 AM Subject: [db-wg] Re: [lir-wg] Re: ERX of v4 address space proposal
Peter Galbavy wrote:
192.0.0.0/8 ?
The swamp is coming to RIPE or which poor RIR ?
Our current data shows that around 753 networks will go to APNIC, 9072
stay with ARIN, 92 will go to LACNIC and 3176 to RIPE NCC.
192/8 will be processed as last and sweet piece, and statistics will be
updated.
Peter
Regards,
Andrei
----- Original Message ----- From: "Andrei Robachevsky" <andrei@ripe.net> To: <db-wg@ripe.net>; <lir-wg@ripe.net> Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 1:54 PM Subject: [lir-wg] Re: ERX of v4 address space proposal
Dear Colleagues,
You may find a list of networks (/8's) containing allocations that will
be transferred by the ERX project at the following URL: http://www.ripe.net/db/erx/erx-ip/
A detailed list of which networks will be transferred, and to which RIR,
will be posted before each /8 is transferred. A full schedule for each
network will also be published for each /8.
Regards,
Andrei Robachevsky CTO, RIPE NCC
_______________________________________________________ Sök företag på Gula Sidorna http://www.gulasidorna.se