Hi, On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 09:23:10PM +0200, James Aldridge wrote:
F.2 "Official Sub-Allocations" Proposal [Gert Doering]
F.3 "MIR/SUB-LIR" Proposal (WG action from RIPE40)
http://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail-archives/lir-wg/20010701-20020101/msg00138.htm...
Is this still needed following the implementation of "status: LIR-PARTITIONED" (documentation) or do we still need a more hierarchical allocation scheme (policy)?
I think this is more or less the same agenda item - the "sub-allocation proposal" came from the MIR/SUB-LIR discussion, I just wrote it down :-) And yes, I think that discussion is needed whether LIR-PARTITIONED is enough or whether we need more "official hierarchy"... Gert Doering -- NetMaster -- Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations: 74810 (74196) SpaceNet AG Mail: netmaster@Space.Net Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Tel : +49-89-32356-0 80807 Muenchen Fax : +49-89-32356-299