Kurt Erik Lindqvist wrote:
Well, you could also argue that what Peter is trying to do is not what the intent of IPv6 is at all. The intent of IPv6 is that everyone can use public address space and we could get some interesting services working. That was ofcourse until the "let's copy RFC1918 into IPv6 and launch site-locals which preferably are globally unique" mob took over....sarcastic? me? never...
Sorry, but am I missing something ? It has been hard enough for some of us to slowly push large corporations away from requiring (companies like) us to use X.25 over leased lines to using IPsec etc. Trying to mandate those people use publicly routeable IP space for what they consider 'confidential' traffic is a non starter. And some people wonder why IPv6 will *never* make it ? (No sarcasm intended). Peter