Hi, On Wed, Mar 05, 2003 at 09:11:08AM +0000, Carlos Friacas wrote:
Personnally i wouldnt be against seeing "Global IPv6 internet exchange points assignments" turning into: "Global IPv6 internet critical infrastructure assignments". On the other hand, a third category of assignments (for TLDs management only) could be created. In these cases, /48s assignments from RIRs seems very reasonable to me, not /32s.
I strongly oppose this. There is nothing special about a TLD name server (or any name server, to be precise, that is not a root name server). Neutrality doesn't come into play - as soon as the TLD holder purchases connectivity anywhere, he isn't neutral anymore anyway. I see using upstream space not significantly different from using upstream connectivity. Gert Doering -- NetMaster -- Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations: 57021 (57147) SpaceNet AG Mail: netmaster@Space.Net Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Tel : +49-89-32356-0 80807 Muenchen Fax : +49-89-32356-299