Dear Jean-Francois, As the largest ISDN dial-in provider for internet-customers in the Netherlands we have established a network (270 B-channels) with IP address pools wich are dynamically assigned to the BRI/PRI ports. We'll be happy to advice you (as a local-registry for ripe we also see the need for maintaining the current IP space !). Lets have a contact early next year (due to hollidays). Greetings Patrick M. van Eijk General Manager Network Operations & Services Planet Internet Holding B.V. E-mail : pvaneijk@pi.net --- On Wed, 20 Dec 1995 17:57:51 +0100 (MET) Jean-Francois Stenuit <jef@donald.interpac.be> wrote:
Received: from ncc.ripe.net (ncc.ripe.net [193.0.0.129]) by mailhost.pi.net (8.6.12/8.6.11) with SMTP id TAA01558; Wed, 20 Dec 1995 19:21:36 +0100 Received: by ncc.ripe.net id AA08214 (5.65a/NCC-2.30); Wed, 20 Dec 1995 18:00:08 +0100 Received: from donald.interpac.be by ncc.ripe.net with SMTP id AA08206 (5.65a/NCC-2.30); Wed, 20 Dec 1995 18:00:03 +0100 Received: from donald (jef@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by donald.interpac.be (8.7.1/8.7.1) with SMTP id RAA27224 for <local-ir@ripe.net>; Wed, 20 Dec 1995 17:57:53 +0100 (MET) Date: Wed, 20 Dec 1995 17:57:51 +0100 (MET) From: Jean-Francois Stenuit <jef@donald.interpac.be> X-Sender: jef@donald To: local-ir@ripe.net Subject: IP addresses question Message-Id: <Pine.SOL.3.90.951220174843.27069A@donald> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Content-Length: 1337
Hello,
We are currently fixing our routing policy for clients using dialup-ISDN connections and are facing some problems.
Theorically (Cisco point of vue), avery network should have a different number. That means we need 3 network ranges (our network, ISDN network and client network).
As IP address space is becoming quite scarce these days, we don't want to use registered addresses for the ISDN network (it doesn't have to be visible from the Internet).
We have three solutions : - use RFC1597 addresses, but there is no reverse DNS for such addresses (problem when doing a traceroute) - use some kind of unnumbered scheme, but it's difficult to manage on Cisco routers with multiple dial-in BRI. - use a registered addresses anyway ...
Any advice, experience ?
--
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> /Jean-Francois "Jef" Stenuit | Interpac Belgium NV/SA | // Amiga \ \Internet administrator | 350/358 Avenue Louise Box 11 | \\// fanatic / /Phone (32)(2) 646-6000 | B-1050 Brussels | \/ \ \Fax (32)(2) 640-3638 | Belgium | & SparcStation / /Email stenuit@interpac.be | | addict ... \ <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
-----------------End of Original Message----------------- ------------------------------------- Name: Patrick M. van Eijk E-mail: pvaneijk@pi.net Date: 21-12-95 Time: 10:24:57 -------------------------------------