The chairs put forth this interim policy proposal to these lists hoping to garner consensus or judge that consensus does not exist.
The ensuing discussion, while not unuseful, does not appear (to me) to be helping the chairs and the wg membership from gauging the extent to which there is consensus for this interim policy proposal.
So I ask:
I think it was your intent to separate discussion/improvement from "tallying" pro.s and com.s - so IŽll summarize my comments in a separate message...
In lieu of any other policy changes, are you, as a RIPE member and participant in the LIR, EIX, and IPv6 WGs, in favor of the interim policy proposal for IPv6 address assignment policy for internet exchange points?
YES.
/david
Wilfried. _________________________________:_____________________________________ Wilfried Woeber : e-mail: Woeber@CC.UniVie.ac.at UniVie Computer Center - ACOnet : Tel: +43 1 4277 - 140 33 Universitaetsstrasse 7 : Fax: +43 1 4277 - 9 140 A-1010 Vienna, Austria, Europe : RIPE-DB: WW144, PGP keyID 0xF0ACB369 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~:~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~