To me, this rather sounds like a case for revisiting reservation, rather than arguing for a new registry type/structure/rules. Am I missing something? Wilfried. ______________________________________________________________________ Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 13:58:24 +0200 From: Gert Doering <gert@space.net> To: Adrian Bool <aid@vianw.net> CC: lir-wg@ripe.net Subject: Re: [hostmaster-staff] Re: MIR proposal Hi, On Fri, Sep 28, 2001 at 12:05:41PM +0100, Adrian Bool wrote:
I feel that international networks require the ability to operate according to the same rules as RIPE - just working on a smaller scale - as another level down in the hierarchy.
Not only "international networks", but also national ones that have a hierarchical structure of re-sellers.
i.e We should should be able to apply for more IP space once we have sub-allocated 80% of our allocation to our in-country networks - natuarally in a responsible manner, according to the same rules that an RIR would allocate space to these in-country networks.
Sure. Gert Doering -- NetMaster -- SpaceNet AG Mail: netmaster@Space.Net Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Tel : +49-89-32356-0 80807 Muenchen Fax : +49-89-32356-299