Rimas, you mean - than end-users could use this zz.unspecified reg-id in order to perform reverse delegation records by themselves? Tanja Rimas Janusauskas wrote:
Hi all,
Maybe it makes sense to cover PI assignments as zz.unspecified registry?
This should not harm checking robot and/or end-user ;-)
Regards,
Rimas Janusauskas, Vilnius University Hostmaster
On Wed, 24 Apr 2002, Dominic Spratley wrote:
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2002 17:00:28 +0200 From: Dominic Spratley <dominic@ripe.net> To: Tanja Heimes <theimes@de.cw.net> Cc: lir-wg@ripe.net Subject: Re: Creation of Reverse Delegation Objects
Hi Tanja,
There are several reasons why we do not accept requests directly from end-users. Most are based on the fact that the Internet Registry system is hierarchical. This means that we are funded by LIRs to provide services to them, not to end-users.
Yours sincerely,
Dominic Spratley,
R.S. Assistant Manager, RIPE NCC
At 09:45 AM 4/24/2002 +0200, Tanja Heimes wrote:
My question now:
Should Provider Indepent IP space not be 100% Provider Indepent in concern to its administration in the RIPE DB? In my opinion the RIPE Robot should distinguish between PA and PI space and not request an reg-id for customers that own PI space and like to create a reverse delegation record.
Best regards,
Tanja Heimes
-- Tanja Heimes / IP Engineer E-Mail Tanja.Heimes@de.cw.com Cable & Wireless Deutschland GmbH TEL. + 49 89 92699-0 Landsberger Strasse 155 Fax. + 49 89 92699-810 D-80687 Munich, Germany web: http://www.cw.com/de