peering seperate from transit?? and a AS used for peering, may not be viewable at a looking glass
-----Original Message----- From: owner-lir-wg@ripe.net [mailto:owner-lir-wg@ripe.net] On Behalf Of Arnd Vehling Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2002 6:38 AM To: s.willing@mops.net Cc: lir-wg@ripe.net Subject: Re: [lir-wg] AS Number Policy - continued
Sebastian Willing wrote:
I'ld suggest to first use all AS-# allocated to RIPE. Then
re-use the
AS-# which has the oldest revoke-date (but only if this date is older than one year or so).
Thats an good suggestion too.
I dont know if this is out-of-scope of this discussion, but i would suggest that a LIR, which applies for an AS-Num, should be required to fax a written peering agreement signed by at least 2 upstream-providers.
This should reduce the the number of initialy unused as-nos somewhat.
best regards,
Arnd -- NetHead Network Design and Security Arnd Vehling av@nethead.De Gummersbacherstr. 27 Phone: +49 221 8809210 50679 Köln Fax : +49 221 8809212