| Much more important than working out the details of what criteria qualify | you for a /22 would be what criteria will cause RIPE to revoke the /22 it | has assigned. The proposal was that in order to qualify for a "standard /20 PA block" you would need to
- Demonstrated efficient utilisation of a /xx (/22?) Or - Immediate need for a /xx (/22?)
- Agree to renumber (Required? Recommended?)
So the proposal is that in order to get a /20 you need to provide documentation that you need some percentage of that adress space (25%). As current policy states, the assignments you make from this allocation are only valid for as long as the criteria it was assigned under is stil valid. While I agree that it at some point would be interesting to discuss how to be more agressive reclaiming address space, I would urge the WG to focus on the proposal from RIPE NCC: - should we introduce a creiteria for PA allocations - if so what should that criteria be. -hph