Re: [ipv6-wg] Latest draft for RIPE554-bis
Hi, First of all thanks to all who participated in the update of this document ! Its only a few weeks before the RIPE 83 virtual meeting, so I hope most of the discussion will be here on the list before the meeting. During RIPE 83 we have only a 45 minute slot altogether so we don't have unlimited time there to discuss these. I hope we have enough consensus to have this published during the meeting, so please show your support, or ask, comment etc already now. Rgds, Ray IPv6 wg co chair -----Original Message----- From: ipv6-wg <ipv6-wg-bounces@ripe.net> On Behalf Of Tim Chown via ipv6-wg Sent: tiistai 2. marraskuuta 2021 17.05 To: ipv6-wg@ripe.net Cc: Sander Steffann <sander@steffann.nl>; Jan Zorz - Go6 <jan@go6.si>; Merike Kaeo <merike@doubleshotsecurity.com> Subject: [ipv6-wg] Latest draft for RIPE554-bis Hi, Attached below is the latest draft for RIPE554-bis, the update to Requirements For IPv6 in ICT Equipment. The authors have incorporated feedback received on and off list, and believe the current draft is a candidate to be considered towards publication. We have a slot in the upcoming RIPE meeting to present and discuss the latest changes, but further list feedback would be welcome now. Is it ready to ship? If not, why not? The original version can be found at https://www.ripe.net/publications/docs/ripe-554 Best wishes, Tim
Thanks Ray. I think it’s pretty clear this update is needed; the current 554 is 10 years old, and much of what’s in it has itself been updated with revised specs, and of course many new RFCs have been published since. What’s really needed is a good look at the RFCs included as mandatory and optional for each class of equipment. Do these seems sensible? Are there any gaps? Have we missed something that’s included for hosts but not (say) routers? etc. We’ve had some feedback on that, which has made this new version better - thanks to those who contacted us. I’d also point out that as explained at the previous RIPE meeting we’ve not expanded the scope of the document, so the classes of equipment are the same (and we folded mobile devices into hosts, so we’re not considering the cellular requirements) and topics such as segment routing are not included. We felt it important on focusing on getting a bis out, and not delaying that by jumping into new ratholes. Further documents could follow though. Tim
On 3 Nov 2021, at 08:16, Jetten Raymond <raymond.jetten@elisa.fi> wrote:
Hi,
First of all thanks to all who participated in the update of this document ! Its only a few weeks before the RIPE 83 virtual meeting, so I hope most of the discussion will be here on the list before the meeting. During RIPE 83 we have only a 45 minute slot altogether so we don't have unlimited time there to discuss these.
I hope we have enough consensus to have this published during the meeting, so please show your support, or ask, comment etc already now.
Rgds,
Ray
IPv6 wg co chair
-----Original Message----- From: ipv6-wg <ipv6-wg-bounces@ripe.net> On Behalf Of Tim Chown via ipv6-wg Sent: tiistai 2. marraskuuta 2021 17.05 To: ipv6-wg@ripe.net Cc: Sander Steffann <sander@steffann.nl>; Jan Zorz - Go6 <jan@go6.si>; Merike Kaeo <merike@doubleshotsecurity.com> Subject: [ipv6-wg] Latest draft for RIPE554-bis
Hi,
Attached below is the latest draft for RIPE554-bis, the update to Requirements For IPv6 in ICT Equipment.
The authors have incorporated feedback received on and off list, and believe the current draft is a candidate to be considered towards publication. We have a slot in the upcoming RIPE meeting to present and discuss the latest changes, but further list feedback would be welcome now. Is it ready to ship? If not, why not?
The original version can be found at https://www.ripe.net/publications/docs/ripe-554
Best wishes, Tim
participants (2)
-
Jetten Raymond -
Tim Chown