Peter B. Juul wrote but the active guidelines - specifically the demand for three peers in the default-free zone, a demand that can't be met for political and economical reasons - made this impossible.
There is no such thing as a default-free zone for IPv6 anyway. Not in the v4 sense, and there is no definition for IPv6 DFZ. I presented this at the 6bone meeting in Minneapolis, might want to have a look at it. http://arneill-py.sacramento.ca.us/ipv6mh/ietf53.ppt
Francis Dupont wrote => sub-TLAs are for ISPs, not for NRENs. The solution for a NREN is either to disguise itself as an ISP,
Which is really easy to do. When you look at the requirements, you can even meet the 200 /48s assigned to end-users quickly, just get all your local linux chapter buddies and some of your co-workers and students and voila, you have 200 users and now you are an ISP. As far as I know, there is no requirement for the links to be native v6, so tunnels would work fine. Gee, you don't have to be a NREN, you can even get that for your home. </sarcasm>
or to join the 6bone.
Or both. There are some experiments that you could run over 6bone address space and don't want your "production" v6 network to be affected. Michel.
Michel, On Fri, May 10, 2002 at 08:21:08AM -0700, Michel Py wrote:
Peter B. Juul wrote but the active guidelines - specifically the demand for three peers in the default-free zone, a demand that can't be met for political and economical reasons - made this impossible.
There is no such thing as a default-free zone for IPv6 anyway. Not in the v4 sense, and there is no definition for IPv6 DFZ. I presented this at the 6bone meeting in Minneapolis, might want to have a look at it. http://arneill-py.sacramento.ca.us/ipv6mh/ietf53.ppt
You can present whatever you want, but I don't have a 'default route' that points to any of my ipv6 peers. David K. speaking for myself ---
participants (2)
-
David Kessens -
Michel Py