Link to publicly available DNS64/NAT64 implementations
Dear IPv6 WG, As promised during the IPv6 WG meeting at RIPE70, I'm sending the link with information how to test remotely different implementations of NAT64 that we are running in Go6lab: http://go6lab.si/current-ipv6-tests/nat64dns64-public-test/ Ecdysis is the weakest one and somehow a bit buggy, so please use the PAN and C1000 ones, that are dedicated boxes for this test and *will* handle the traffic and translation process ;) Cheers, Jan Zorz
On 14 May 2015, at 11:41, Jan Zorz wrote:
Dear IPv6 WG,
As promised during the IPv6 WG meeting at RIPE70, I'm sending the link with information how to test remotely different implementations of NAT64 that we are running in Go6lab:
http://go6lab.si/current-ipv6-tests/nat64dns64-public-test/
Ecdysis is the weakest one and somehow a bit buggy,
why is it? FYI, Ecdysis has been integrated into OpenBSD pf and is now part of the OpenBSD bistro. That version is more stable. So I would suggest to use an openbsd platform to do testing and get best results (compared to the linux one). Marc.
so please use the PAN and C1000 ones, that are dedicated boxes for this test and *will* handle the traffic and translation process ;)
Cheers, Jan Zorz
* Marc Blanchet
On 14 May 2015, at 11:41, Jan Zorz wrote:
Dear IPv6 WG,
As promised during the IPv6 WG meeting at RIPE70, I'm sending the link with information how to test remotely different implementations of NAT64 that we are running in Go6lab:
http://go6lab.si/current-ipv6-tests/nat64dns64-public-test/
Ecdysis is the weakest one and somehow a bit buggy,
why is it?
FYI, Ecdysis has been integrated into OpenBSD pf and is now part of the OpenBSD bistro. That version is more stable. So I would suggest to use an openbsd platform to do testing and get best results (compared to the linux one).
Or, if there is a desire to run the implementation Linux in the first place, I'd suggest Jool (http://jool.mx), which is actively maintained. BTW all the NAT64 prefixes given on the page are incorrect, at least if the ping6 test targets given are correct the NAT64 prefixes are all /96es, not /64s. Tore
Hi, as someone from the audience asked during the session - we had a (probably very similar, Andrew Yourtchenko inspired) v6-only SSID recently at the IPv6 Security Summit. Details incl. the relevant config snippets can be found at: https://www.troopers.de/media/filer_public/66/b2/66b2da26-c2d1-4478-8890-2cd... thanks Enno -- Enno Rey ERNW GmbH - Carl-Bosch-Str. 4 - 69115 Heidelberg - www.ernw.de Tel. +49 6221 480390 - Fax 6221 419008 - Cell +49 173 6745902 Handelsregister Mannheim: HRB 337135 Geschaeftsfuehrer: Enno Rey ======================================================= Blog: www.insinuator.net || Conference: www.troopers.de Twitter: @Enno_Insinuator =======================================================
participants (4)
-
Enno Rey -
Jan Zorz -
Marc Blanchet -
Tore Anderson