Dear IPv6 WG!

Below follows the second version of the IPv6 wg agenda.

[ snip ]

B. Comments on the Provisional Assignment on Allocation of IPv6 addresses document (ipv6-wg & lir-wg) - Why is a dial-up link treated differently - should such users get a /48 or a /64 ?!? - Public or private addresses recommendation for point-to-point links - What constitutes 80% utilization ?!?

I'd really like to recommend to all of you to review the message with feedback from the Co-Chairs of the IETF IPng Working Group and the NGTrans Working Group chairs. as distributed on Mon, 31 Jan 2000 15:27:47 +0100 by Mirjam Kuehne <mir@ripe.net> to ipv6-wg@ripe.net subject: FYI - Re: IPv6 Policy Document Review Regards, Wilfried. _______________________________________________________________________ Wilfried Woeber : e-mail: Woeber@CC.UniVie.ac.at UniVie Computer Center - ACOnet : Tel: +43 1 4277 - 140 33 Universitaetsstrasse 7 : Fax: +43 1 4277 - 9 140 A-1010 Vienna, Austria, Europe : RIPE-DB: WW144, PGP keyID 0xF0ACB369 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ First things first, but not necessarily in that order....