[ipv6-wg@ripe.net] ipv6 address format
Hello, I'm in the process of reviving ipv6 on our network. I'm new to IPv6 so this questions is perhaps obvious. I found an old company document which lists the following format for an IPv6 address. | 16 | 19 | 13 | 16 | 64 bits | +-+---------+------+-----------+--------+-----------------+ | 0x2001 | sTLA | NLA | SLA ID | Interface ID | +-+---------+------+-----------+--------+-----------------+ I'm confused here, reading RFC2373 I found the folowing format |3| 13 | 8 | 24 | 16 | 64 bits | +-+---------+-----+------------+--------+-----------------+ | | TLA ID | RES | NLA ID | SLA ID | Interface ID | +-+---------+-----+------------+--------+-----------------+ Hmmm, what's wrong. -Jeroen- -- Jeroen Valcke sst@belnet.be jeroen.valcke@belnet.be
All of them are wrong there is a 3 bit prefix, followed by a 61 bit field that is considered continuous and last is a 64 bit field that can be used for the interface id or other host identifier. TLA/NLA/SLA terminology is deprecated. Use CIDR prefix notation, a /32, a /48 ,etc Joao At 12:44 +0200 9/4/03, Jeroen Valcke wrote:
Hello,
I'm in the process of reviving ipv6 on our network. I'm new to IPv6 so this questions is perhaps obvious.
I found an old company document which lists the following format for an IPv6 address.
| 16 | 19 | 13 | 16 | 64 bits | +-+---------+------+-----------+--------+-----------------+ | 0x2001 | sTLA | NLA | SLA ID | Interface ID | +-+---------+------+-----------+--------+-----------------+
I'm confused here, reading RFC2373 I found the folowing format
|3| 13 | 8 | 24 | 16 | 64 bits | +-+---------+-----+------------+--------+-----------------+ | | TLA ID | RES | NLA ID | SLA ID | Interface ID | +-+---------+-----+------------+--------+-----------------+
Hmmm, what's wrong.
-Jeroen-
-- Jeroen Valcke sst@belnet.be jeroen.valcke@belnet.be
Hi Jeroen, the new format is defined in: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ipv6-unicast-aggr-v2-02.txt regards, marcelo On Wed, 2003-04-09 at 12:44, Jeroen Valcke wrote:
Hello,
I'm in the process of reviving ipv6 on our network. I'm new to IPv6 so this questions is perhaps obvious.
I found an old company document which lists the following format for an IPv6 address.
| 16 | 19 | 13 | 16 | 64 bits | +-+---------+------+-----------+--------+-----------------+ | 0x2001 | sTLA | NLA | SLA ID | Interface ID | +-+---------+------+-----------+--------+-----------------+
I'm confused here, reading RFC2373 I found the folowing format
|3| 13 | 8 | 24 | 16 | 64 bits | +-+---------+-----+------------+--------+-----------------+ | | TLA ID | RES | NLA ID | SLA ID | Interface ID | +-+---------+-----+------------+--------+-----------------+
Hmmm, what's wrong.
-Jeroen- -- marcelo bagnulo <marcelo@it.uc3m.es> uc3m
participants (3)
-
Jeroen Valcke -
Joao Luis Silva Damas -
marcelo bagnulo