Preview of the final RIPE-501bis.
Dear IPv6 WG. After long and exhausting IETF week, where we met with some great experts from the industry and did some sanity checks and corrected some mistakes and misunderstandings in the RIPE-501-replacement document, we are issuing next (9th) version of the draft, that is in our opinion really final one. I mean it. Last one. There was lot's of time, efforts and work put into this document and I think we are done. This replacement document is also meant as a some kind of input or initial template for EU IPv6 profile, so we wanted it to be very solid and accurate. Thanks to all of you involved, you know who you are (you are all in Acknowledgements section ;) ) and thnx to this WG and their co-chairs for support, help and all good comments. We already set the last version to RIPE-NCC for grammar checks and conversion into HTML in order to appear in RIPE Documents section as a draft, but meantime, we are publishing the last version also in PDF in order for you, community, to read it prior to RIPE64 meeting. http://go6.si/docs/Requirements-for-IPv6-in-ICT-equipment-v.9.pdf Please, those of you who are interested and have time, read it and express you r opinions and possible comments. Rumor has it, that we'll have "review" period over the RIPE64 meeting and Last call shortly after that. As this is not an official PDP, we can also propose chairs to change the procedure, if there is any need for that. Track of the progress and different versions of the draft can be found at: http://go6.si/ripe501bis/ Cheers from co-authors: Merike, Sander and Jan
Jan, With all due respect, but you are confusing our working group: On Fri, Apr 06, 2012 at 09:07:18AM +0200, Jan Zorz @ go6.si wrote:
Please, those of you who are interested and have time, read it and express you r opinions and possible comments. Rumor has it, that we'll have "review" period over the RIPE64 meeting and Last call shortly after that. As this is not an official PDP, we can also propose chairs to change the procedure, if there is any need for that.
Please do not mix the PDP process and document approval process. These two things have nothing to do with each other. This document is a RIPE document. It is not a RIPE policy and does not need to go through the PDP process. All we need to do to get a RIPE document published is to reach consensus among the (working) group that wishes to publish a document. The ipv6 working group chairs will do a formal Last Call to confirm consensus when we feel the document is ready for publication. There is no magic here: if we hear from a significant number of people (which includes the authors) that we have reached this point and we see that the document has stabilized, we will issue such a Last Call. David Kessens cochair of the ipv6 working group ---
On 4/10/12 7:37 AM, David Kessens wrote:
Jan,
With all due respect, but you are confusing our working group:
On Fri, Apr 06, 2012 at 09:07:18AM +0200, Jan Zorz @ go6.si wrote:
Please, those of you who are interested and have time, read it and express you r opinions and possible comments. Rumor has it, that we'll have "review" period over the RIPE64 meeting and Last call shortly after that. As this is not an official PDP, we can also propose chairs to change the procedure, if there is any need for that.
Please do not mix the PDP process and document approval process.
These two things have nothing to do with each other. This document is a RIPE document. It is not a RIPE policy and does not need to go through the PDP process.
All we need to do to get a RIPE document published is to reach consensus among the (working) group that wishes to publish a document. The ipv6 working group chairs will do a formal Last Call to confirm consensus when we feel the document is ready for publication. There is no magic here: if we hear from a significant number of people (which includes the authors) that we have reached this point and we see that the document has stabilized, we will issue such a Last Call.
David Kessens cochair of the ipv6 working group ---
ack. So, if we ask at the WG meeting in Ljubljana if they want it published and community says yes - we publish it? Actually, I think we are done with babysitting the doc :) Cheers, Jan
Jan, On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 09:31:41AM +0200, Jan Zorz wrote:
So, if we ask at the WG meeting in Ljubljana if they want it published and community says yes - we publish it?
Anybody can ask the working group anything, but we as wg chairs would like to issue a formal Last Call on the mailing list to make sure everybody including people not at the meeting have a last chance to see if all comments were implemented correctly and whether there are no serious issues left that need to be addressed. Having said this, I believe we should definitely ask our participants at the meeting whether this document is ready for Last Call and has reached the "good enough" stage. Comments on the mailing list from people who have reviewed the latest version are obviously welcome as well. David Kessens ---
participants (3)
-
David Kessens
-
Jan Zorz
-
Jan Zorz @ go6.si