Re: Proposal for new charter
The working group activities may be anything useful in helping people deploy IPv6. These activities include: * Outreach * Co-operation * Education
I also would like to propose to add "handle early deployment experiences" or wording to that effect - as I reported yesterday, the PMTU-thing reported on the list during the RIPE meeting. We're at the beginning of large-scale deployment and I believe that we cannot accept the "if something doesn't work, just switch off the IPv6 stack" approach people currently have to take, and I have a few reasons to believe my problem is not unique. We're testing new technology, building a new network - making support work for large-scale consumer-grade deployment is one of the next challenges we face, I think. Geert Jan
Thus wrote Geert Jan de Groot (GeertJan.deGroot@xs4all.nl):
The working group activities may be anything useful in helping people deploy IPv6. These activities include: * Outreach * Co-operation * Education
I also would like to propose to add "handle early deployment experiences" or wording to that effect - as I reported yesterday, the PMTU-thing reported on the list during the RIPE meeting.
I think it would be unwise to limit to early deployment experiences. "So we had the network running happily for 3 years and then we needed to expand it and ran into the following, oops" is quite valuable too (and IPv6 won't be the new thing forever either :) Of course the 1001st "we deployed and it ping6es, wheee!" is fun for the people involved but not necessarily a topic for a mailing list like this. So, "reports on novel problems and experiences", maybe? Native speakers to the fore :) regards, spz -- spz@serpens.de (S.P.Zeidler)
On 20 okt 2009, at 17:01, S.P.Zeidler wrote:
Thus wrote Geert Jan de Groot (GeertJan.deGroot@xs4all.nl):
The working group activities may be anything useful in helping people deploy IPv6. These activities include: * Outreach * Co-operation * Education
I also would like to propose to add "handle early deployment experiences" or wording to that effect - as I reported yesterday, the PMTU-thing reported on the list during the RIPE meeting.
I think it would be unwise to limit to early deployment experiences. "So we had the network running happily for 3 years and then we needed to expand it and ran into the following, oops" is quite valuable too (and IPv6 won't be the new thing forever either :)
Of course the 1001st "we deployed and it ping6es, wheee!" is fun for the people involved but not necessarily a topic for a mailing list like this. So, "reports on novel problems and experiences", maybe? Native speakers to the fore :)
Keep in mind a charter should be somewhat short and not to specific, it's not the agenda... Groet, MarcoH
indeed! On 20 Oct 2009, at 11:36, Marco Hogewoning wrote:
Keep in mind a charter should be somewhat short and not to specific, it's not the agenda...
Groet,
MarcoH
Keep in mind a charter should be somewhat short and not to specific, it's not the agenda...
+1 If we can stick to that, we can shorten this process to minimum amount of time and efforts spent. Thnx, Jan Zorz
Hello I totally agree with the new charter. May be we could also add in sharing information and experience some visits between operators , ISPs .... Regards, Lionel HOFFMANN Direction Technique Tel: 01 39 45 42 76 Mob: 06 60 31 42 76 Email: lhoffman@bouyguestelecom.fr Adresse: Centre d'affaires La Boursidiere RN186 92355 LE PLESSIS ROBINSON cedex -----Message d'origine----- De : ipv6-wg-admin@ripe.net [mailto:ipv6-wg-admin@ripe.net] De la part de S.P.Zeidler Envoyé : mardi 20 octobre 2009 17:01 À : Geert Jan de Groot Cc : ipv6-wg@ripe.net Objet : Re: [ipv6-wg] Re: Proposal for new charter Thus wrote Geert Jan de Groot (GeertJan.deGroot@xs4all.nl):
The working group activities may be anything useful in helping people deploy IPv6. These activities include: * Outreach * Co-operation * Education
I also would like to propose to add "handle early deployment experiences" or wording to that effect - as I reported yesterday, the PMTU-thing reported on the list during the RIPE meeting.
I think it would be unwise to limit to early deployment experiences. "So we had the network running happily for 3 years and then we needed to expand it and ran into the following, oops" is quite valuable too (and IPv6 won't be the new thing forever either :) Of course the 1001st "we deployed and it ping6es, wheee!" is fun for the people involved but not necessarily a topic for a mailing list like this. So, "reports on novel problems and experiences", maybe? Native speakers to the fore :) regards, spz -- spz@serpens.de (S.P.Zeidler) L'intégrité de ce message n'étant pas assurée sur internet, la société expéditrice ne peut être tenue responsable de son contenu ni de ses pièces jointes. Toute utilisation ou diffusion non autorisée est interdite. Si vous n'êtes pas destinataire de ce message, merci de le détruire et d'avertir l'expéditeur. The integrity of this message cannot be guaranteed on the Internet. The company that sent this message cannot therefore be held liable for its content nor attachments. Any unauthorized use or dissemination is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, then please delete it and notify the sender.
participants (6)
-
Geert Jan de Groot -
HOFFMANN, Lionel -
Jan Zorz ＠ go6.si -
joao damas -
Marco Hogewoning -
S.P.Zeidler