On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 11:38:46AM +0200, Kostas Zorbadelos wrote:
I am sure that RIPE NCC is not the only interested party for the publication of an assignment-size attribute.
Interest != need. Publishing potentially sensitive data just because people are "interested" is not a good enough reason in my book of data protection principles. Next time people ask for weekly updated fill-level: attributes in PD pools so "interested" folks can "transparently" verify wether usage levels are according to the rules that NCC enforces (and obtain further business intelligence as a side effect, how convenient). Anyway, as the proposal is in Last Call, I'll rest my case. I'm still totally unconvinced that this a good idea. Best regards, Daniel -- CLUE-RIPE -- Jabber: dr@cluenet.de -- dr@IRCnet -- PGP: 0xA85C8AA0