19 Jul
2011
19 Jul
'11
2:17 p.m.
On 7/19/11 1:44 PM, Ahmed Abu-Abed wrote:
I am not proposing a change with respect to existing RFCs; we must to live with existing /64 subnets as a minimum allocation.
My comments apply for future networks beyond the current 2000::/3 range used by all RIRs. Beyond this range all options are still open.
I don't think so. IPv6 as protocol applies over all ::/0, not only 2000::/3 Why do you think ND and SLAAC would behave differently in 4000::/3 ? Cheers, Jan