Gert, On Fri, Sep 04, 2009 at 06:25:09PM +0200, Gert Doering wrote:
On Fri, Sep 04, 2009 at 08:47:29AM -0700, David Kessens wrote:
You clearly have not read the minutes and/or have been at any of the meetings as we have run out of time every single meeting in the past few years and we needed the largest meeting room available.
Which might not be *so* contradictory in the end.
If we consider IPv6 to be "the mainstream Internet" in the future, the IPv6 content will sort of naturally move to "the plenary" (because that's what we all should be interested in, no?). If that happens, the question "what remains to be specifically discussed inside the IPv6 WG" is a valid one.
Yes, that should be the natural course when IPv6 is going to become more mainstream. Even now already, we carefully weigh (with plenary/eof program committee) whether certain topics are more fit for the plenary program or for the IPv6 working group. David Kessens ---