I think the information that we host for long time ago in The IPv6 Portal is much more complete: http://www.ipv6tf.org/index.php?page=using/connectivity/6to4 Same for Teredo: http://www.ipv6tf.org/index.php?page=using/connectivity/teredo I'm going to post those links in the Wiki also. Regards, Jordi
De: <michael.dillon@bt.com> Responder a: <ipv6-wg-admin@ripe.net> Fecha: Sat, 20 Oct 2007 06:29:04 +0100 Para: <ipv6-wg@ripe.net> Conversación: [ipv6-wg] Re: [address-policy-wg] DRAFT: RIPE Community Resolution on IPv4 Depletion and Deployment of IPv6 Asunto: RE: [ipv6-wg] Re: [address-policy-wg] DRAFT: RIPE Community Resolution on IPv4 Depletion and Deployment of IPv6
Performance impacts when both hosts doing peer-to-peer (or client-to-server) are using different types of IPv6 connectivity (example, native vs. 6to4 or Teredo, or Teredo vs. 6to4). This is solved by deploying 6to4 and Teredo relays in the ISPs, and is actually something inexpensive that ISPs should do while they can't provide native access.
This is something that is described in more detail on ARIN's IPv6 wiki targetted at ISPs: http://www.getipv6.info/index.php/First_Steps_for_ISPs
--Michael Dillon
********************************************** The IPv6 Portal: http://www.ipv6tf.org Bye 6Bone. Hi, IPv6 ! http://www.ipv6day.org This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the use of the individual(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, including attached files, is prohibited.