25 May
2018
25 May
'18
8:34 p.m.
On 5/25/18 4:41 PM, Patrik Fältström wrote:
No, the text above, where the names of he organisations are in a footnote, implies precisely that ITU should *not* develop their own things but instead cooperate so that what is developed in other SDOs matches whatever needs ITU believes exists. Without the text, RIPE would never have got the liaison in the first place.
hi, you clearly say it implies that, ok. i'm just stressing the fact that in this wg it's worthless arguing about ITU's manners as a further argument in favor of the lack of technical quality of the paper. let's stick to the tech issues. thank you -- antonio