On Fri, 10 May 2002, Gert Doering wrote:
On Fri, May 10, 2002 at 03:44:28PM +0200, Peter B . Juul wrote:
On Fri, May 10, 2002 at 04:39:33PM -0200, Yucel Guven wrote:
I also aggre with Peter and suggest attendees of RIPE-42 meeting to discuss about this requirement/demand.
Ah, sorry, no, the RIPE-42 ended on may 3rd. I was just asking if this had been discussed, as I'd heard from other sources it would be. The minutes are sometimes a while in the making (sorry, David) so I just wanted to see if someone could give a short reply on that specific point.
That specific point is history. There was consensus that the outstanding new "Global IPv6 interim policy draft" (that was posted just a few weeks ago in a revised edition) was to be made new policy.
Wether that helps you depends on your network - criteria for getting IPv6 allocations boil down to "you must be willing to assign IPv6 networks to a substantial number of third party sites". If you're assigning to research institutes, universities, and so on, the criteria should be easily met.
(The last paragraph: ) Wrong. Section d), assingning at least 200 /48's is new compared to previous RIPE-only draft policy. This is a requirement that most NREN's can *not* honestly meet. -- Pekka Savola "Tell me of difficulties surmounted, Netcore Oy not those you stumble over and fall" Systems. Networks. Security. -- Robert Jordan: A Crown of Swords