On Wed, 2010-02-03 at 10:01 +0100, Gert Doering wrote:
If people think there is an interest in having a NAT-broken network around, then please make it available on a dedicated SSID, but don't experiment with the meeting network.
Long version: After having read this thread, this one paragraph by Geert makes a lot of sense. Points made in this thread were, in the order my client presented them to me: 1) Do not experiment with the RIPE meeting network 2) Do not push single-stack IPv6 down people's throat 3) Do push bleeding IPv4 down people's throat 4) Testing out what the rest of the world shortly will experience is useful Given 1), it makes a lot of sense to put 2) + 3) on a separate SSID. Give it a well-descriptive name and that's it... Problem solved! Attendees can do testing on their *own* terms, which is bound to make them happier. Short version: I second this statement. :) Regards, -- Martin Millnert <millnert@csbnet.se>