27 Jan
2011
27 Jan
'11
10:38 a.m.
On Wednesday, January 26, 2011 09:36:55 pm Daniel Roesen wrote: <snip> ...
I oppose on grounds of paragraph 2 of "Arguments Opposing the Proposal".
The only one who needs the assignment size is RIPE NCC when evaluating new allocation requests or in audit. ... </snip>
I am sure that RIPE NCC is not the only interested party for the publication of an assignment-size attribute. I think the advantages clearly outweigh the disadvantages here. I support this proposal. Regards, Kostas