Hi Dan and list, 🔓Dan Wing <dwing@cisco.com> writes:
On 15-May-2015 02:25 am, Benedikt Stockebrand <bs@stepladder-it.com> wrote:
[Implications of NAT64]
To avoid some of that, they can go IPv6-only, including their servers and all peers they communicate with, then there doesn't need to be NAT64 for their traffic. But even IPv6-only they will need firewall traversal support, as firewalls by default will block unsolicited incoming traffic (RFC6092).
I'm not sure if I get you correctly, but: Do you mean IPv6 only, or dual-stacked servers (so whatever a client connects with works without translation)? Cheers, Benedikt -- Benedikt Stockebrand, Stepladder IT Training+Consulting Dipl.-Inform. http://www.stepladder-it.com/ Business Grade IPv6 --- Consulting, Training, Projects BIVBlog---Benedikt's IT Video Blog: http://www.stepladder-it.com/bivblog/