9 Jan
2015
9 Jan
'15
9:57 a.m.
Am 09.01.2015 um 09:22 schrieb Jan Zorz @ go6.si:
On 07/01/15 11:38, Ole Troan wrote:
there are at least eight IETF solutions (L2TP, DS-lite, 464XLAT, Public 4over6, Lightweight 4over6, 4rd, MAP-T, MAP-E) to the same problem (IPv4 or shared IPv4 over IPv6). it's going to be interesting to figure out how 554bis should deal with that.
Hi,
my first thought would be to put them in Optional section? :)
What do you think or suggest?
Cheers, Jan
Hi, Yes, put them in the optional section. I don't think many vendors want to implement all of them in their CPE routers. If we put too many technologies in the "mandatory" section, the vendors will ignore the document and it becomes useless. Cheers, Wilhelm