I'm probably just totally confused, but anyway: A) A lot of people (including RFC 3177) claim every residential user should get a /48. A few recent opinions are collected here: http://blog.ioshints.info/2010/12/how-much-ipv6-address-space-should.html B) The ripe-481-draft says "However, all /48 assignments to End Sites are required to be registered either by the LIR or its subordinate ISPs ..." which means that a LIR or an ISP would have to register every residential user. What am I missing? Thanks, Ivan Pepelnjak www.ioshints.info
-----Original Message----- From: ipv6-wg-admin@ripe.net [mailto:ipv6-wg-admin@ripe.net] On Behalf Of Emilio Madaio Sent: Monday, December 13, 2010 3:45 PM To: policy-announce@ripe.net Cc: ipv6-wg@ripe.net; db-wg@ripe.net; address-policy-wg@ripe.net Subject: [ipv6-wg] 2010-06 New Policy Proposal (Registration Requirements for IPv6 End User Assignments)
Dear Colleagues,
The IPv6 WG Chairs have decided that the proposal 2010-06 is ready for a 2 week Review Phase. Marco Hogewoning did not participate to the decision as he is a co-proposer.
Following the feedback received, the draft documents for this proposal have been published. The impact analysis that was conducted for this proposal has also been published.
You can find the full proposal at:
http://ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2010-06.html
and the draft documents at:
http://ripe.net/ripe/draft-documents/ripe-481-draft2010-06.html http://ripe.net/ripe/draft-documents/ripe-new-draft2010-06.html
We encourage you to read the draft document text and send any comments to ipv6-wg@ripe.net before 27 December 2010.
Regards
Emilio Madaio Policy Development Officer RIPE NCC