right, but it would be good if there are not multiple versions evolving in parallel. I think david was trying to helpful but unintentionally introduced confusion. So, Shane could you perhaps merge all input up to this point and put a new version out for comment? Then David can perhaps wrap up the discussion and call for consensus? Joao On 27 Oct 2009, at 16:55, Kostas Zorbadelos wrote:
On Thursday 22 October 2009 23:40:48 David Kessens wrote:
I finally managed to read the entire thread.
From all the discussions up to know, I prefer the wording of David's proposal. So I support this while waiting for Shane's input.
It's really nice to see this mailing list being utilized.
Kostas Zorbadelos
----
IPv6 is the next generation of the Internet Protocol (IP). The IPv6 working group exists to advance the adoption of IPv6 in the Internet.
The working group activities cover anything that facilitates the deployment of IPv6 and that supports the co-existence of IPv6 and IPv4.
These activities include:
* Outreach * Education * Share and track deployment experiences * Propose solutions for operational issues
----