Hi, On 25 Oct 2013, at 11:35, Shane Kerr <shane@time-travellers.org> wrote:
All,
We saw two presentations by network architects at the RIPE meeting that used bits in their IPv6 addressing plan to carry meaning beyond simple network topology and packet routing.
For example, declaring a specific bit in the address to be 1 for voice traffic or 0 otherwise.
There are motivations for doing this, which may or may not be valid in any particular case. There are ways to lessen the amount of addresses consumed by this (for example by assigning /56 instead of /48 to end users).
But I think that the important thing is that we have historically not considered this sort of use with address allocation policy. In face, RFC 2050bis was *just* published as RFC 7050:
Seems ike more of http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jiang-semantic-prefix-06 Which has drawn mixed reaction at the IETF. Tim