On 19.11.2010 14:59, Ivan Pepelnjak wrote:
Editorial comment: the bullet ...
"If 6PE is requested, the equipment must comply with "Connecting IPv6 Islands over IPv4 MPLS Using IPv6 Provider Edge Routers (6PE)” [RFC4798]"
... in the "router or layer-3 switch" section is rephrased somewhat more generically in the bullet ...
"If MPLS functionality (for example, BGP-free core, MPLS TE, MPLS FRR) is requested, the PE-routers and route reflectors must support "Connecting IPv6 Islands over IPv4 MPLS Using IPv6 Provider Edge Routers (6PE)" [RFC 4798]"
... in the same section. I would suggest we remove the first one.
Ivan Pepelnjak www.ioshints.info/about
Pipi hi, thnx for comment. Chairs, can we include this as a minor editorial change in final document, if there are no other comments? I suggest we publish this document as v.1 and then start accumulating proposed ideas for v.2. Thnx to community again for all your expressed support, all the discussion and great RIPE61 meeting we had in Rome! ;) Best, Jan Zorz go6.si