Re: [ipv6-wg] Last Call (20101117): Requirements For IPv6 in ICT Equipment

On 8.11.10 10:00, Isacco Fontana wrote:

6VPE (RFC 4659) 6PE (RFC 4798)

These RFC are related to MPLS environment so I think 6PE and 6VPE should be mandatory for ISP that are using MPLS and offer ipv6 for direct internet connections and 6VPE for ipv6 over vpn mpls services.

So, the correct wording inside mandatory section would be: - if IPv6 over MPLS and IPv6 over VPN MPLS features are requested, 6PE or 6VPE must be supported [RFC4798, RFC4659] The contracting authority shall specify the required protocol. Is this acceptable? Thnx, Jan Zorz