I wonder what interpretation of "other organizations" is used when RIPE NCC evaluates the applications..? -- Pekka Savola "Tell me of difficulties surmounted, Netcore Oy not those you stumble over and fall" Systems. Networks. Security. -- Robert Jordan: A Crown of Swords ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 00:12:29 +0300 (EEST) From: Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi> To: David Kessens <david@iprg.nokia.com> Cc: 6bone@ISI.EDU Subject: [6bone] Re: sTLA alloc policies On Tue, 22 Oct 2002, David Kessens wrote:
On Sun, Oct 20, 2002 at 05:36:10PM +0300, Pekka Savola wrote:
Oh, Nokia must also have colored the truth slightly..
What are you trying to insinuate here ?!? Please refrain from such comments if you don't know the details.
Indeed, the applications are not public so I do not, unfortunately, know details :-(
We got our address space under the old rules.
Ah, I didn't notice this.
Despite this, it really shouldn't be too hard for any large multinational company to show plans for assigning address space to 200 other organizations. No need to color the truth at all.
You must be using some other definition of other organizations than I do. Further, I don't believe there are even 200 countries out there. :-) Let's see. Extending your interpretation any company with 200 employees could be entitled to a block: they _do_ want to provide xDSL service and proper addresses to their employees (who are private users) using the recommended /48 assignment! Right.. -- Pekka Savola "Tell me of difficulties surmounted, Netcore Oy not those you stumble over and fall" Systems. Networks. Security. -- Robert Jordan: A Crown of Swords _______________________________________________ 6bone mailing list 6bone@mailman.isi.edu http://mailman.isi.edu/mailman/listinfo/6bone