15 Jun
2016
15 Jun
'16
7:56 p.m.
On 15 June 2016 at 16:44, Mark Tinka <mark.tinka@seacom.mu> wrote:
The FIB penalty has the potential to be huge.
It's a shame there's not real interest in deploying a protocol like LISP that addresses the DFZ bloat problem. I know there are problems, it isn't a trivial deployment, but if the will was there, I'm sure challenges could be overcome. It would also allow providers to deploy IPv6 without having to have native IPv6 connectivity from their upstreams - as a dynamic tunnel protocol, LISP is better than a single tunnel to HE or whatever. Aled